Soul, death and western science

Can Machines Possess Originality? p 686

Unless you are a soulist, you'll probably say that [your sense of having a will] comes from your brain --a piece of hardware which you didn't design or choose. And yet that doesn't diminish your sense that you want certain things, and not others. You are a "self-programmed object" [...]

Can We Understand Our Own Minds or Brains? p 697

[...] might there not be some vaguely Gödelian loop which limits the depth to which any individual can penetrate into his own psyche? Just as we cannot see our faces with our own eyes, is it not reasonable to expect that we cannot mirror our complete mental structures in the symbols which carry them out?
All the limitative Theorems of metamathematics and the theory of computation suggest that once the ability to represent your own structure has reached a certain critical point, that is the kiss of death: it guarantees that you cannot represent yourself totally.

Gödel's Theorem and Personal Nonexistence, p 698

Perhaps the greatest contradiction in our lives, the hardest to handle, is the knowledge "There was a time when I was not alive , and there will come a time when I am not alive".

Science and Dualism, p 699

Step by step, inexorably, "Western" science has moved towards investigation of the human mind --which is to say, of the observer.

Ism once again, p 704

Cage had led a movement to break the boundaries between art and nature. In music, the theme is that all sounds are equal [...] Leonard B. Meyer, in his book Music, the Arts, and Ideas, has called this movement in music "transcendentalism" [...]

Undecidability Is Inseparable from a High-Level Viewpoint, p 708

G's nontheoremhood is, so to speak, an intrinsically high-level fact. It is my suspicion that this is the case for all undecidable propositions; that is to say: every undecidable proposition is actually a Gödel sentence, asserting its own nontheoremhood in some system via some code.

Strange Loops as the Crux of Consciousness, p 709

My belief is that the explanations of "emergent" phenomena in our brains --for instance, ideas, hopes, images, analogies, and finally consciousness and free will-- are based on a kind of Strange Loop, an interaction between levels in which the top level reaches back down towards the bottom level and influences it, while at the same time being itself determined by by the bottom level.

Table of contents
Marc Girod
Last modified: Thu Oct 12 16:50:57 EETDST 2000