(ref.doc)bs 010495

Next clamage 230395 Prev: clamage 290395 Up: Usenet

Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.std.c++,comp.object Note:
 Stroustrup
Subject: Re: Errata for The Design and Evolution of C++
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 1995 22:54:51 GMT


Many people have informally proposed GC. However, nobody has written a
formal proposal and submitted it to the committee. John Ellis has done
a lot of good work, but - very reasonably, I think - decided that this
was not the time to deal with GC in the context of the standard.

I don't think GC - in any of the forms that has been discussed - has
any chance for this standard. This, of course, doesn't prevent people
from experimenting or from using a conservative garbage collector.

The reasoning that lead to status quo is described in some detail in D&E.